Credits
12
Types
Compulsory
Requirements
This subject has not requirements
, but it has got previous capacities
Department
DAC;CS;OE;TSC;ETSETB;ESSI
The course will be managed using Atenea.
Teachers
Person in charge
- Alberto Cabellos Aparicio ( acabello@ac.upc.edu )
Others
- Alexandre Gracia Calvo ( alexandre.gracia@upc.edu )
- Carlos Lopez Martinez ( carlos.lopezmartinez@upc.edu )
- Elisenda Bonet Carné ( elisenda.bonet@upc.edu )
- Eva Rodriguez Luna ( evar@ac.upc.edu )
- Joan Carles Gil Martin ( joan.carles.gil@upc.edu )
- Joan Sarda Ferrer ( joan.sarda@upc.edu )
- Jose Adrian Rodriguez Fonollosa ( jose.fonollosa@upc.edu )
- Silverio Juan Martínez Fernández ( silverio.martinez@upc.edu )
Weekly hours
Theory
2
Problems
0
Laboratory
6
Guided learning
0
Autonomous learning
12
Competences
Technical competencies
Transversals
Basic
Generic
Objectives
-
Complete the objectives of the Entrepreneurship and Innovation subject by improving the business plan developed on the same product or service.
Related competences: CT1, CT2, CG3, CG4, -
From the technical solution developed in the project, to deepen the knowledge and methodologies acquired in the different subjects of the degree and to add value from their integration.
Related competences: CE1, CE10, CE11, CE12, CE13, CE2, CE3, CE4, CE5, CE6, CE7, CE8, CE9, CG1, CG2, -
Conceive, design, implement and plan the operation and complete life cycle of a product or service, based on the challenge defined by an external company or institution. Obtain the results of learning of the transversal and generic skills from a team work context on a high complexity design challenge.
Related competences: CB3, CB4, CB5, CB2, CT1, CT2, CT3, CT4, CT7,
Contents
-
Specific technical contents.
Depending on the topic of the project, it may be necessary to impart specific contents, additional to those obtained in previous subjects. -
Advanced and reinforcing content for the business plan.
Although this part has been covered in the previous Entrepreneurship and Innovation subject, there will be seminars and tutorials to complete and improve the final version of the business plan as it may have modifications as you implement the technical solution. Includes: Training of work teams. Refining the Business Model. Refining the product or service design. Refining the marketing plan. Business development. Legislation and regulations. Intellectual property. Business plan. Provisional financial statements. Treasury plan. Analysis of economic, environmental and social sustainability.
Activities
Activity Evaluation act
Seminars
Strengthening and mentoring the aspects associated with the business plan, the legal aspects and the sustainability of the project, applied to the specific case of the project being developed.Objectives: 3 1
Contents:
Theory
28h
Problems
0h
Laboratory
0h
Guided learning
0h
Autonomous learning
20h
Presentation of initial project planning (Preliminary Design Review)
Preparation and presentation of the project plan in public for validation.Objectives: 3
Contents:
Theory
0h
Problems
0h
Laboratory
2h
Guided learning
0h
Autonomous learning
4h
Presentation of the critical review of the progress of the project (Critical Design Review)
Mid-term presentation of the critical review of the project (Critical Design Review) in order to detect malfunctions or forecasts that are difficult to fulfill and correct them.Objectives: 3
Contents:
Theory
0h
Problems
0h
Laboratory
2h
Guided learning
0h
Autonomous learning
4h
Final presentation of the project (Final design Review)
Final presentation of the project and the associated business plan (Final Design Review). Depending on the confidentiality agreement with the external institution that has proposed it, it can be done in conjunction with other projects or behind closed doors only with representatives of the institution.Objectives: 2 1 3
Contents:
Theory
2h
Problems
0h
Laboratory
2h
Guided learning
0h
Autonomous learning
6h
Teaching methodology
In this subject the work plan designed to implement and validate the functional prototype of the product or service designed in the Entrepreneurship and Innovation (EI) subject is carried out. Therefore, most of the hours are hands-on in the lab, with faculty present to support and monitor the progress of the project (90). There are also a significant number of hours of autonomous, individual or subgroup work (180). At the same time, the concepts associated with the business plan are actively reviewed and revised and completed in a way that is consistent with the technical implementation developed. The responsibility for defining and monitoring the work plan corresponds to the team, mainly to the team leader. A follow-up meeting is held every week and there is, at least, three presentations to the external company or institution (Preliminary Design Review, Critical Design Review, Final Design Review)Evaluation methodology
In PE, evaluation relies on rubrics that serve as comprehensive assessment criteria. Each element within these rubrics undergoes a qualitative analysis, often articulated through a sentence that describe the performance of the team or student regarding that specific criterion. Based on this qualitative assessment, a corresponding mark ranging from 0 to 10 is assigned to the deliverable.The project¿s deliverables (Presentation, Proposal, and Report) are each evaluated individually. These individual assessments contribute to the overall project evaluation. Finally, the project as a whole is assessed using a set of specific criteria, with each criterion weighted appropriately to reflect its significance in the overall evaluation.
It is important to note that academic staff can adjust these weights to account for special circumstances. For example, if a particular deliverable is of exceptionally poor quality or is not submitted at all, the weights can be modified accordingly. Conversely, if an element's quality significantly exceeds expectations, exceptions can be made to reflect this outstanding performance.
Finally, a student's individual mark corresponds to the overall project mark in which they participated. This mark can be adjusted based on peer assessment evaluations, typically within a range of +/- 10%. However, exceptions may be made in special cases, such as instances of exceptionally poor or outstanding performance by a student.
Project Assessment
¿ 10% - Process/Team performance: Team dynamics. Ability to manage uncertainty. Interaction with the stakeholders.
¿ 20% - Technical performance: Ability to select and manage the right DS methods and the auxiliary tools (UI, databases, APP frameworks,...)
¿ 20% - Results: Quality and justification of the results.
¿ 15% - Presentation: According to the presentation rubrics
¿ 15% - Project Proposal & Report: According to Project Proposal and Report rubric
¿ 15% - Video: Quality of the video as a tool to visualize the challenge and the solution
¿ 5% - Costs, IP: accuracy of costs estimation.
The rubrics (presentation, proposal, and peer evaluation) will be made public on the course website.
Apart from the natural imbrication of the basic and transversal specified skills in the development of the course and on its assessment, the following transversal skills are explicitly evaluated using a qualitative scale (A, B, C, D, NA):
CT1 - Entrepreneurship and innovation. From the continuation or adaptation of the development of the business model designed in EI and the inclusion of innovative aspects in the technical solution.
CT3 - Effective oral and written communication. From the evaluation by rubrics of the reports and of the intermediate and final presentations.
CT4 - Teamwork. Based on the evidences collected by the supervisors in the team meetings and on the final rubric of peer assessment.
Although the fair fulfilment of the assigned tasks should lead to a favourable assessment, in the event that the subject is failed, students are entitled, in accordance with the academic regulations of the degree, to a re-evaluation test which would consist of an individual presentation in front of a committee of the overall project and of the individual contribution. The panel would consist of the subject coordinator, one of their teachers and an external member who is a teacher of a project subject of another degree. In this case the final mark is the maximum between the regular mark and the re-evaluation mark.
Bibliography
Basic
-
Product design and development
- Ulrich, K.T.; Eppinger, S.D.; Yang, M.C,
McGraw-Hill Education,
2019.
ISBN: 9781260566437
https://discovery.upc.edu/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma991004179709706711&context=L&vid=34CSUC_UPC:VU1&lang=ca